Know where you stand.
BorderAudit benchmarks your customs performance against anonymised peers — by customs agent, by supplier, by trade lane — so you can see which relationships are quietly creating duty and risk, and stop the same error repeating across your book.
The same error, paid for again and again.
Your own declaration data can’t tell you what normal looks like — a systematic error is perfectly consistent from the inside. These are the patterns a peer benchmark exposes.
One book of declarations. Three ways to compare it.
Benchmarks are built from anonymised, aggregated platform data at sector and commodity level — never against a named competitor, and never exposing any importer’s data.
Customs agent benchmarking
Objective visibility into how each agent's work on your entries compares — against the platform's anonymised aggregate, and against each other if you use more than one.
- Declaration quality indicators across your book
- Preference claims made vs preferences available
- Classification consistency vs the peer consensus
- Side-by-side comparison across multiple agents
Supplier benchmarking
The duty profile each supplier attracts, compared with anonymised peers importing similar goods from the same origins — so sourcing conversations get a customs column.
- Effective duty profile, supplier by supplier
- Preference utilisation on each supplier's goods
- Classification patterns vs the category consensus
- Origin concentration across your supply base
Trade lane benchmarking
Each origin-to-UK trade lane compared with peers moving similar goods on the same lane — which reliefs and preferences are claimed, evidenced, or quietly missed.
- Preference utilisation, lane by lane
- Where peers claim relief that you don't
- Origin evidence and proof-requirement gaps
- Duty variance across alternative routes
A note on fairness: divergence from the peer consensus is a place to ask a question, not proof of an error. Your agents can’t see their own benchmark — the intelligence is yours, as the importer.
From benchmark to fixed, in five moves.
A benchmark that only produces a chart changes nothing. This one is wired to the rest of the platform — every divergence traces to entries, and every fix is trended so it holds.
- 01 · BASELINEYour book, benchmarkedYour declaration history is compared against anonymised, aggregated peers at sector and commodity level — by agent, by supplier, by trade lane.
- 02 · DIVERGENCEThe outliers, surfacedWhere an agent, a supplier or a lane diverges from the peer consensus, the divergence is flagged — with the declaration patterns behind it.
- 03 · ROOT CAUSETraced to the entriesEvery flag traces back to specific entries, so you can tell a one-off from a misunderstanding from a systematic repeat error.
- 04 · FIX ONCECorrected at sourceA standing instruction to your agent, an evidence request to a supplier, a preference claim added to a lane — fix the source and every future entry inherits it.
- 05 · HOLDTrended, so it stays fixedBenchmarks recalculate as new declarations land, so an error creeping back is visible early — and where the error meant overpaid duty, the finding feeds a reclaim.
Visibility that changes conversations.
The scale behind the benchmark.
Customs benchmarking, answered.
Find out where you stand.
A 30-minute call with a customs specialist. We’ll walk through how agent, supplier and lane benchmarks are built from your declaration data, what the free tier includes, and where a book like yours most often diverges from its peers.
See how you compare.
Agent, supplier and lane benchmarks built from anonymised peers — and wired into the platform so repeat errors get fixed once, at source. Free to start; Premium £149/month, never a success fee.
